I generally have a rule: I don’t see movies adapted from books until after I’ve read the book. I’ve stuck by this rule so seriously in the past that I even refused to see the Lord of the Rings films in theaters before I finished reading the books.
That was, in retrospect, really dumb, because I ended up not being able to see any of them in a theater until college, when the Del Mar in downtown Santa Cruz was doing a marathon of them. Movies like that are meant to be seen on a big screen, and now I regret not going when they first came out. But oh well, what did I know? I was thirteen.
The reason for this rule can be attributed to the Harry Potter films. As a kid, I was so disappointed by the movies. They’re basically incomprehensible without the background knowledge of the books. So I came to the conclusion that you need to read the book before seeing the movie, or you wouldn’t enjoy it. (And even then, you would probably be disappointed.)
This isn’t necessarily true, though. If something is adapted well, it can stand on its own. Fans of the book might be disappointed that some things were left out or altered, but it can still be its own version of the story.[1] Movies and books are different mediums; adaptations necessarily have differences.
I didn’t know the 2018 movie Love, Simon was adapted from a book when I saw it in a theater. And it was such a well-made film… I didn’t really have to have read the book.
I’m glad I did though.
Continue reading “Book 20: Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda by Becky Albertalli”


